From: Ron Mayer <rm_pg@cheapcomplexdevices.com>
To: Brendan Jurd <direvus@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Use of "postmaster"
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 18:37:18 -0700
Message-ID: <470443CE.70601@cheapcomplexdevices.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <37ed240d0710031527r5279b336m9dfc0f48a257be90@mail.gmail.com>
References: <37ed240d0710031527r5279b336m9dfc0f48a257be90@mail.gmail.com>
Brendan Jurd wrote:
> Seems it would be best to apply this
> nomenclature consistently, and simply drop the name "postmaster" from
> use.
>
+1 I agree the term postmaster references in the docs, etc should
go away - with perhaps the exception of one faq that say that
postmaster's a deprecated name in case anyone encounters it
in other web sites or old docs.
PS: Oh it's so hard to resist saying it should be renamed
"postmaSQLter".
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: rm_pg@cheapcomplexdevices.com, direvus@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Use of "postmaster"
In-Reply-To: <470443CE.70601@cheapcomplexdevices.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox