From: Vik Fearing <vik.fearing@dalibo.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: PG Docs <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: VALIDATE CONSTRAINT
Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2013 17:32:40 +0200
Message-ID: <5224AF98.9000905@dalibo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <15351.1378133409@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <52244B75.6040507@dalibo.com>
<15351.1378133409@sss.pgh.pa.us>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-docs>
On 09/02/2013 04:50 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Vik Fearing <vik.fearing@dalibo.com> writes:
>> Is there a reason, besides simple oversight, that commit
>> 073d7cb513f5de44530f4bdbaaa4b5d4cce5f984 was not backpatched?
>> I think it needs to be.
> AFAICS, it was.
>
> Author: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
> Branch: master [073d7cb51] 2013-06-18 12:09:39 +0100
> Branch: REL9_3_STABLE [0ae1bf8c1] 2013-06-18 12:10:10 +0100
> Branch: REL9_2_STABLE [20a562f91] 2013-06-18 12:00:32 +0100
> Branch: REL9_1_STABLE [be039d4b2] 2013-06-18 12:05:48 +0100
That does seem to indicate it was. But it doesn't seem they made it to
the website:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/sql-altertable.htmlhttp://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/sql-altertable.html
--
Vik
--
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: vik.fearing@dalibo.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
Subject: Re: VALIDATE CONSTRAINT
In-Reply-To: <5224AF98.9000905@dalibo.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox