pg.ddx.io  pgsql-docs@postgresql.org mailing list archive  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
To: Robert Treat <rob@xzilla.net>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>
Cc: David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org <pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Clarify VACUUM FULL exclusion in total_vacuum_time docs
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2025 18:27:51 +0200
Message-ID: <5400d859b612e1365a4bae3cf47fec1c3ed736ab.camel@cybertec.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJSLCQ0Sh5YsOfdMXdTQQzTC2gVgVQdrkUekDvk_cvPj7p5YPA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <2ac375d1-591b-4f1b-a2af-f24335567866@oss.nttdata.com>
	<CAKFQuwYgErraNuAUme-6dSwmwNSSStC8SL7560Qy2sAtUG5J+Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABV9wwMs4g9nq-fKy=fFqU-rQUf6fiCqJg4_+MkqOnJE1n2TBA@mail.gmail.com>
	<f58eb77f-0d8f-4f58-bed2-a100bd7e0814@oss.nttdata.com>
	<CAJSLCQ3YPKaB7tQDyg8BbVuo80EGn_j6kycNGG3oZB59P8tgrg@mail.gmail.com>
	<bb97b8d4-2f44-4b95-9b82-a54ecbce9e76@oss.nttdata.com>
	<CAJSLCQ27T5utjOipbaqArGCPS1VT+2Uqx_g2NH3od_spHxkoig@mail.gmail.com>
	<b1cfd248-6860-4a95-bb62-07009f5e486e@oss.nttdata.com>
	<213ce4a8cc0e481229bdf2198f5c44285eb3e53a.camel@cybertec.at>
	<CAJSLCQ0Sh5YsOfdMXdTQQzTC2gVgVQdrkUekDvk_cvPj7p5YPA@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, 2025-07-15 at 10:27 -0400, Robert Treat wrote:
> On the other hand, reading the VACUUM reference page, I get the
> > feeling that the new syntax with parentheses should be favored.
> > After all, the old syntax doesn't support any of the recently
> > added options and restricts the option order.
> > 
> > So perhaps we should start propagating the parentheses more, and
> > the documentation is the perfect place to do that.
> 
> That might make sense, but how far we want to take it in the first go
> around seems like a discussion that is best put forth in a separate
> thread / patch.

Makes sense, and I have no objection to the patch as it is.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe





view thread (12+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <5400d859b612e1365a4bae3cf47fec1c3ed736ab.camel@cybertec.at>
Permalink:  ../5400d859b612e1365a4bae3cf47fec1c3ed736ab.camel@cybertec.at/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/5400d859b612e1365a4bae3cf47fec1c3ed736ab.camel@cybertec.at

 · 

reply
Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
  Cc: laurenz.albe@cybertec.at, rob@xzilla.net, masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com, david.g.johnston@gmail.com, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: Clarify VACUUM FULL exclusion in total_vacuum_time docs
  In-Reply-To: <5400d859b612e1365a4bae3cf47fec1c3ed736ab.camel@cybertec.at>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox