From: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: 9.4 recommendations for archive_command vs. replication slots
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 15:47:05 -0700
Message-ID: <54516E69.2060007@agliodbs.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <WM!8cacb5b04161cc548517e289b42e413c6772613a57b43f8937049cebb6eea300579ec63d180ccd198147a08b8d2b3ed6!@asav-3.01.com>
References: <54454EB7.9010601@gmx.net>
<WM!8cacb5b04161cc548517e289b42e413c6772613a57b43f8937049cebb6eea300579ec63d180ccd198147a08b8d2b3ed6!@asav-3.01.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-docs>
On 10/20/2014 11:04 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> The 9.4 documentation for streaming replication still starts out by
> making you set up archive_command and restore_command. Isn't that
> obsolete now with replication slots? Shouldn't the first step be to set
> up replication slots and then go from there?
Well, bluntly, our replication docs should be taken out behind the barn
with an axe. They tell you more about the development history of
PostgreSQL than they tell you about how to replicate.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
--
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: josh@agliodbs.com
Subject: Re: 9.4 recommendations for archive_command vs. replication slots
In-Reply-To: <54516E69.2060007@agliodbs.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox