From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Cc: Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Large SGML Cleanup
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 10:38:28 -0400
Message-ID: <5983.1288795108@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1288788816-sup-8169@alvh.no-ip.org>
References: <AANLkTi=1Sm9N3Khiued9UiMfdd_TKLimMiO9mCfHtL39@mail.gmail.com>
<1288788816-sup-8169@alvh.no-ip.org>
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> I wonder if it would be better to see about switching the toolchain.
We certainly seem to be pushing the limits of the existing toolchain
... but are there any genuinely better alternatives out there?
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, alvherre@commandprompt.com, schmiddy@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Large SGML Cleanup
In-Reply-To: <5983.1288795108@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox