pg.ddx.io  pgsql-docs@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Luzanov <p.luzanov@postgrespro.ru>
To: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
To: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Correction for vacuum_multixact_failsafe_age
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 11:29:27 +0300
Message-ID: <59fcaa26-32ce-5c74-9d63-c509759f4d66@postgrespro.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <056c2150c6aed337c3ea7dfe3c57cb74e0399b54.camel@cybertec.at>
References: <c71a3cfc-a267-3d9f-1b44-fbd668d0ab10@postgrespro.ru>
	<056c2150c6aed337c3ea7dfe3c57cb74e0399b54.camel@cybertec.at>

Hello,

>> When trying to make a link to the new vacuum_multixact_failsafe_age parameter,
>> I found the wrong ID for this guc (missed word vacuum).
>> Please consider this patch for a fix.
> It is good to be consistent, but the name of the link is not essential, is it?
> Changing it might break existing outside links.

Not essential, it's true. I haven't seen any rules in the documentation
on forming links for guc.

But how many external links could have been made since September 30?
And how many times in the future will people encounter inconsistency
in constructing a link to this parameter?

It seems to me that it's better to fix it.

But right now I need a link to this parameter for an article,
and I want to see if there's a chance to change the reference to the 
familiar one
or use the current one.

Pavel Luzanov
Postgres Professional: https://postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company






view thread (9+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <59fcaa26-32ce-5c74-9d63-c509759f4d66@postgrespro.ru>
Permalink:  ../59fcaa26-32ce-5c74-9d63-c509759f4d66@postgrespro.ru/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/59fcaa26-32ce-5c74-9d63-c509759f4d66@postgrespro.ru

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
  Cc: p.luzanov@postgrespro.ru, laurenz.albe@cybertec.at, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: Correction for vacuum_multixact_failsafe_age
  In-Reply-To: <59fcaa26-32ce-5c74-9d63-c509759f4d66@postgrespro.ru>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox