From: Erik Wienhold <ewie@ewie.name>
To: Jonathan Lemig <jtlemig@gmail.com>
To: pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Views "missing" from information_schema.view_table_usage
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2022 23:08:11 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <63158593.42022.1670018891326@office.mailbox.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2133999369.41448.1670016807570@office.mailbox.org>
References: <CABR8q__QVKFzaUdQQsyU2wd2TZX1tdv7Q8M5myQ8L=BDDAtjLQ@mail.gmail.com>
<2133999369.41448.1670016807570@office.mailbox.org>
> On 02/12/2022 22:33 CET Erik Wienhold <ewie@ewie.name> wrote:
>
>
> > On 02/12/2022 21:51 CET Jonathan Lemig <jtlemig@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Has anybody ever encountered this, and if so, did you find a resolution?
> > Or perhaps there other limitations with the VTU that I'm unaware of?
>
> Is the one view you cannot find in view_table_usage a materialized view?
> Because those are not covered by view_table_usage[1].
>
> [1] https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=blob;f=src/backend/catalog/information_schema....
Never mind. I forgot that you wrote that it appears in pg_views. So it's a plain view.
--
Erik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: ewie@ewie.name, jtlemig@gmail.com, pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Views "missing" from information_schema.view_table_usage
In-Reply-To: <63158593.42022.1670018891326@office.mailbox.org>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox