pg.ddx.io  pgsql-docs@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Cc: codyrank@gmail.com, pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Broken link
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2024 11:56:34 +0100
Message-ID: <6B2D6249-1395-4529-BD89-0BCDDA9A2DCF@yesql.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202402061046.xemsplfjzblt@alvherre.pgsql>
References: <202402061046.xemsplfjzblt@alvherre.pgsql>

> On 6 Feb 2024, at 11:46, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
> 
> On 2024-Feb-06, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> 
>>> On 5 Feb 2024, at 22:23, PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> This page has a link that says "See the release notes for PostgreSQL 12 for
>>> details on this change."
>>> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/recovery-config.html
>>> 
>>> The link does not go to the release notes though.
>> 
>> While not directly to the v12 release notes, it leads to a page where the
>> release notes are linked from which seems good enough here.  This is a note on
>> a change that happened in the oldest still supported version, with the previous
>> behavior EOL.
> 
> The release notes for 12.0 [1] say less than the recovery-config.html
> page says about the matter.  I think a good fix for this complaint is to
> remove the whole phrase "See ... for details on this change".
> 
> [1] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/release/12.0/

I'm guessing it's the below entry which is referred to, which I agree isn't
likely to be all that helpful to any reader, more reading is required.

* Move recovery.conf settings into postgresql.conf (Masao Fujii, Simon Riggs,
Abhijit Menon-Sen, Sergei Kornilov)

recovery.conf is no longer used, and the server will not start if that file
exists.  recovery.signal and standby.signal files are now used to switch into
non-primary mode.  The trigger_file setting has been renamed to
promote_trigger_file.  The standby_mode setting has been removed.

That being said, all the obsolote appendix pages share that very link
structure, so I'm not sure if removing one of them is helpful.  Maybe removing
all of them and instead expanding appendix-obsolete.sgml with an explanation of
where to find more information is better?

--
Daniel Gustafsson






view thread (10+ messages)

Message-ID: <6B2D6249-1395-4529-BD89-0BCDDA9A2DCF@yesql.se>
Permalink:  ../6B2D6249-1395-4529-BD89-0BCDDA9A2DCF@yesql.se/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/6B2D6249-1395-4529-BD89-0BCDDA9A2DCF@yesql.se

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
  Cc: daniel@yesql.se, alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: Broken link
  In-Reply-To: <6B2D6249-1395-4529-BD89-0BCDDA9A2DCF@yesql.se>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox