From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Default shared memory SGML mention
Date: Tue, 08 May 2001 16:37:48 -0400
Message-ID: <8134.989354268@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200105082023.f48KNMm28570@candle.pha.pa.us>
References: <200105082023.f48KNMm28570@candle.pha.pa.us>
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Yes, but shared memory limits are based on buffers, not connections,
> right? The per-connection overhead is pretty small, no?
I gave you my experimentally-derived formula already:
250Kb + 8350 * B + 14580 * N
I don't see how you can consider the N term negligible.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, pgman@candle.pha.pa.us
Subject: Re: Default shared memory SGML mention
In-Reply-To: <8134.989354268@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox