pg.ddx.io pgsql-docs@postgresql.org mailing list archive
help / color / mirror / Atom feed"(process)" is missing for some terms about process in glossary
3+ messages / 2 participants
[nested] [flat]
* "(process)" is missing for some terms about process in glossary
@ 2022-01-07 14:37 Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Fujii Masao @ 2022-01-07 14:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Hi,
In glossary, the title of each term about process seems to consist of the process name and "(process)", e.g., Checkpointer (process). But I found that "(process)" is missing for the following three terms about process. Attached is the patch to add "(process)" to them.
- Auxiliary process
- Startup process
- WAL receiver
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/glossary.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/glossary.sgml
index 0c88988fa6..0fea6b4ab3 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/glossary.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/glossary.sgml
@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@
</glossentry>
<glossentry id="glossary-auxiliary-proc">
- <glossterm>Auxiliary process</glossterm>
+ <glossterm>Auxiliary process (process)</glossterm>
<glossdef>
<para>
A process within an <glossterm linkend="glossary-instance">instance</glossterm>
@@ -1490,7 +1490,7 @@
</glossentry>
<glossentry id="glossary-startup-process">
- <glossterm>Startup process</glossterm>
+ <glossterm>Startup process (process)</glossterm>
<glossdef>
<para>
An <glossterm linkend="glossary-auxiliary-proc">auxiliary process</glossterm>
@@ -1972,7 +1972,7 @@
</glossentry>
<glossentry id="glossary-wal-receiver">
- <glossterm>WAL receiver</glossterm>
+ <glossterm>WAL receiver (process)</glossterm>
<glossdef>
<para>
An <glossterm linkend="glossary-auxiliary-proc">auxiliary process</glossterm>
Attachments:
[text/plain] glossary-process_v1.patch (1.0K, ../../51b76596-ab4f-c9f0-1005-60ce1bb14b6b@oss.nttdata.com/2-glossary-process_v1.patch)
download | inline diff:
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/glossary.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/glossary.sgml
index 0c88988fa6..0fea6b4ab3 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/glossary.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/glossary.sgml
@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@
</glossentry>
<glossentry id="glossary-auxiliary-proc">
- <glossterm>Auxiliary process</glossterm>
+ <glossterm>Auxiliary process (process)</glossterm>
<glossdef>
<para>
A process within an <glossterm linkend="glossary-instance">instance</glossterm>
@@ -1490,7 +1490,7 @@
</glossentry>
<glossentry id="glossary-startup-process">
- <glossterm>Startup process</glossterm>
+ <glossterm>Startup process (process)</glossterm>
<glossdef>
<para>
An <glossterm linkend="glossary-auxiliary-proc">auxiliary process</glossterm>
@@ -1972,7 +1972,7 @@
</glossentry>
<glossentry id="glossary-wal-receiver">
- <glossterm>WAL receiver</glossterm>
+ <glossterm>WAL receiver (process)</glossterm>
<glossdef>
<para>
An <glossterm linkend="glossary-auxiliary-proc">auxiliary process</glossterm>
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: "(process)" is missing for some terms about process in glossary
@ 2022-01-07 16:41 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
parent: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Tom Lane @ 2022-01-07 16:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>; +Cc: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> writes:
> In glossary, the title of each term about process seems to consist of the process name and "(process)", e.g., Checkpointer (process). But I found that "(process)" is missing for the following three terms about process. Attached is the patch to add "(process)" to them.
> - Auxiliary process
> - Startup process
> - WAL receiver
I think "Auxiliary process (process)" is redundant to the point
of being silly. +1 for addiing it to "WAL receiver", though,
since that's not obviously a process.
regards, tom lane
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: "(process)" is missing for some terms about process in glossary
@ 2022-01-13 03:22 Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>
parent: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Fujii Masao @ 2022-01-13 03:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>; +Cc: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
On 2022/01/08 1:41, Tom Lane wrote:
> Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> writes:
>> In glossary, the title of each term about process seems to consist of the process name and "(process)", e.g., Checkpointer (process). But I found that "(process)" is missing for the following three terms about process. Attached is the patch to add "(process)" to them.
>
>> - Auxiliary process
>> - Startup process
>> - WAL receiver
>
> I think "Auxiliary process (process)" is redundant to the point
> of being silly. +1 for addiing it to "WAL receiver", though,
> since that's not obviously a process.
Yes, you're right. So I pushed the patch that adds "(process)"
only to the glossary term "WAL receiver". Thanks!
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-01-13 03:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-01-07 14:37 "(process)" is missing for some terms about process in glossary Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>
2022-01-07 16:41 ` Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
2022-01-13 03:22 ` Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox