From: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: "(process)" is missing for some terms about process in glossary
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 12:22:06 +0900
Message-ID: <8741f3ce-6e42-0f71-2096-d7e7d251582e@oss.nttdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1348387.1641573716@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <51b76596-ab4f-c9f0-1005-60ce1bb14b6b@oss.nttdata.com>
<1348387.1641573716@sss.pgh.pa.us>
On 2022/01/08 1:41, Tom Lane wrote:
> Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> writes:
>> In glossary, the title of each term about process seems to consist of the process name and "(process)", e.g., Checkpointer (process). But I found that "(process)" is missing for the following three terms about process. Attached is the patch to add "(process)" to them.
>
>> - Auxiliary process
>> - Startup process
>> - WAL receiver
>
> I think "Auxiliary process (process)" is redundant to the point
> of being silly. +1 for addiing it to "WAL receiver", though,
> since that's not obviously a process.
Yes, you're right. So I pushed the patch that adds "(process)"
only to the glossary term "WAL receiver". Thanks!
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: "(process)" is missing for some terms about process in glossary
In-Reply-To: <8741f3ce-6e42-0f71-2096-d7e7d251582e@oss.nttdata.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox