From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>
Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: outdated legal notice in SGML docs?
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 22:12:24 -0400
Message-ID: <8891.1340935944@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120629001405.GA19998@momjian.us>
References: <4FB56426.7050409@kaltenbrunner.cc>
<1340140601.26286.28.camel@vanquo.pezone.net>
<20120629001405.GA19998@momjian.us>
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:16:41AM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> I've fixed this in all the active back branches. The copyright tool in
>> src/tools/ does inform about doing these changes, but whoever does them
>> has apparently not read that.
> I didn't think we wanted to update back branch copyright end dates
> because that would effect thing like psql \copyright display, and the
> risk didn't seem worth it.
> Do we want back-branches updated in the future?
We have never done that in the past, and I don't think we should start
now. What I thought Peter was complaining about was that legal.sgml
had been missed in the *head* branch. However, a look in the git
history shows that hasn't happened since 2005, so it seems like the
current process is OK.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, bruce@momjian.us, peter_e@gmx.net, stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc
Subject: Re: outdated legal notice in SGML docs?
In-Reply-To: <8891.1340935944@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox