pg.ddx.io  pgsql-docs@postgresql.org mailing list archive  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>
Cc: Patches (PostgreSQL) <pgsql-patches@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 8.2 features?
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 15:10:20 -0400
Message-ID: <9049.1154373020@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44CE529F.2070701@joeconway.com>
References: <200607281947.k6SJlOI02533@momjian.us>
	<473.1154116455@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<44CA76A9.8070101@joeconway.com>
	<44CB051D.6090609@joeconway.com>
	<21320.1154222840@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<26226.1154279741@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<44CE529F.2070701@joeconway.com>

Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes:
> The good news is that from a memory and perfomance standpoint, my simple 
> test now shows us outperforming mysql:

Sweet ;-)

I'm up to my *ss in fixing relation locking, but will get back to your
thing as soon as that's done.  I think you're close enough to qualify
as having made the feature freeze deadline, in any case.

			regards, tom lane

view thread (56+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <9049.1154373020@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../9049.1154373020@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/9049.1154373020@sss.pgh.pa.us

copy link · copy postgr.es

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, mail@joeconway.com, pgsql-patches@postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 8.2 features?
  In-Reply-To: <9049.1154373020@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox