From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>
Cc: PostgreSQL-documentation <docs@postgreSQL.org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] TODO doc items
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 03:07:00 -0400
Message-ID: <9591.955609620@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200004130428.AAA06245@candle.pha.pa.us>
References: <200004130428.AAA06245@candle.pha.pa.us>
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Here are the open doc items. Should we consider ecpg.sgml as up-to-date
> as it needs to be for 7.0?
Michael Meskes said he thought the ecpg page was out of date ... but
AFAICS it's his responsibility to update it. If he doesn't get it
done, is there anyone else qualified to do it?
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, pgman@candle.pha.pa.us, pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org, docs@postgreSQL.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] TODO doc items
In-Reply-To: <9591.955609620@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox