From: Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Contrib modules documentation online
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 17:10:31 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0708291658130.3830@westnet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200708291239.43878.josh@agliodbs.com>
References: <200708290157.07968.albert@nan-tic.com>
<200708291009.07942.josh@agliodbs.com>
<Pine.GSO.4.64.0708291450090.24101@westnet.com>
<200708291239.43878.josh@agliodbs.com>
On Wed, 29 Aug 2007, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Further, you know we don't finish the docs until beta. Ever.
In that context, as long as the documentation cleanup doesn't slow the
schedule for when beta starts I think it would be a great thing to slip
into 8.3. In fact, if those are going higher-profile, I may slip an
update into the docs for pg_buffercache with the queries I keep
recommending people look at.
> What kind of data? On bgwriter_lru autotuning?
That would be my data; HOT is in a similar category. I have many test
results to pass along, and I'd like to know that the people who might help
confirm/deny what I've discovered are as focused as I've been on trying to
wrap all this up already, before wandering into new tangents that aren't
already blocking the schedule. That's all I'm saying.
--
* Greg Smith gsmith@gregsmith.com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: gsmith@gregsmith.com, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Contrib modules documentation online
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0708291658130.3830@westnet.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox