public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Avinash Vallarapu <[email protected]>
To: Laurenz Albe <[email protected]>
Cc: Greg Sabino Mullane <[email protected]>
Cc: David Rowley <[email protected]>
Cc: pgsql-general <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Planet Postgres and the curse of AI
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 12:45:47 -0400
Message-ID: <CAN0Tuje9YiWPhECpuF1sUvENHkYjMVHoGq50aCEowBCB04wmFA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <CAKAnmm+tbPMdP8ccrJ-o_LVgC6ADdOEoh2=J+zyWNLab6B3+_Q@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<CAApHDvrsbj-hCUhB=N+Hbzm2e0a5AjCe6MbB3KMgpDEF15q5CQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAKAnmm+v7Rby=QKs-TCDjr42tjazcndJOPw_6pZVFadU7v9rWw@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CAKAnmmJEZBCAb2E1BgCrTHKXu2TYqKOgTkANWbQ1mCLZBLeNgQ@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
Hi,
As someone who has taken days to publish each blog upon so many reviews,
corrections and edits while
attempting to make it as best/informative and as perfect as possible, it
might seem slightly frustrating when
we see some AI generated content, especially when it is misleading readers.
However, I do agree with Lawrence that it is impossible to prove whether it
is written by AI or a human.
AI can make mistakes and it might mistakenly point out that a blog is
written by AI (which I know is difficult to implement).
I see Moderators spending some time reviewing content and accepting or
warning if it is not related to Postgres.
AI may be adopted to help us score whether an article is related to
Postgres and decline the submission/blog feed.
But, it is very impossible to use AI or some strategy to identify whether
it is written by AI or human.
People may also use AI generated Images in their blogs, and they may be
meaningful for their article.
Is it only the content or also the images ? It might get too complicated
while implementing some rules.
Ultimately, Humans do make mistakes and we shouldn't discourage people
assuming it is AI that made that mistake.
On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 11:51 AM Laurenz Albe <[email protected]>
wrote:
> On Tue, 2024-07-23 at 10:38 -0400, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
> > > Why not say that authors who repeatedly post grossly counterfactual or
> > > misleading content can be banned?
> >
> > Perhaps as you hint at, we need a policy to not just discourage
> AI-generated
> > things, but also wrong/misleading things in general
>
> I have been known to make mistakes in my blogs...
> We shouldn't discourage people who happen to blog something wrong.
> That's why I used strong verbiage like "grossly counterfactual".
>
> Yours,
> Laurenz Albe
>
>
>
--
Regards,
Avinash Vallarapu
view thread (12+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Planet Postgres and the curse of AI
In-Reply-To: <CAN0Tuje9YiWPhECpuF1sUvENHkYjMVHoGq50aCEowBCB04wmFA@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox