public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
To: Fujii Masao <[email protected]>
Cc: Mircea Cadariu <[email protected]>
Cc: Laurenz Albe <[email protected]>
Cc: Zechman, Derek S <[email protected]>
Cc: Adrian Klaver <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: analyze-in-stages post upgrade questions
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2025 13:14:12 -0500
Message-ID: <aJObdBmd9H5YAdW1@nathan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHGQGwEj8PCk1OVveJ_F1sj_COrV95N-mfu_tLUn4gdcAM24kA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <PH0PR04MB8294E796D6297D4E3BE4EFB6C049A@PH0PR04MB8294.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<CAHGQGwEvwpydO7hjnB51Q2zgS0ydv31X4HCFLNzMeqLr=poS8w@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CAHGQGwEj8PCk1OVveJ_F1sj_COrV95N-mfu_tLUn4gdcAM24kA@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Aug 06, 2025 at 11:25:53PM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 6, 2025 at 1:01 PM Mircea Cadariu <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Overall, I like the change. But I have one question: should this be treated as
>> a bug fix that we back-patch to supported branches, or is it more of
>> an improvement that should only go into master?
>>
>> I reckon it might make sense to back-patch it to previous versions, as users might not upgrade always to the latest version.
>
> I understand your point. But on second thought, since the patch changes
> behavior, I'm leaning toward treating it as an improvement, so it should
> only go to master...
I also am leaning towards treating this as v19 material. It's a nontrivial
behavior change, and this option is useful for major version upgrades,
which is an area that we really don't want to surprise users too much.
Furthermore, auto-analyze doesn't process partitioned tables, either, so
this introduces a bit of divergence. (I'd love to see that project picked
up again someday. Perhaps I will take a gander...)
--
nathan
view thread (19+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: analyze-in-stages post upgrade questions
In-Reply-To: <aJObdBmd9H5YAdW1@nathan>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox