From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Bugs in ecpg's macro mechanism
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 21:33:34 -0400
Message-ID: <1071980.1713231214@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240416010544.tsupdybl752vywkw@awork3.anarazel.de>
References: <998011.1713217712@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<20240415231044.fjjibtnwcypowzni@awork3.anarazel.de>
<1063578.1713228436@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<20240416010544.tsupdybl752vywkw@awork3.anarazel.de>
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2024-04-15 20:47:16 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Ah, thanks. I guess this depends on getopt_long reordering arguments
>> (since the "-o outfile" bit will come later). That is safe enough
>> in HEAD since 411b72034, but it might fail on weird platforms in v16.
>> How much do we care about that? (We can avoid that hazard in the
>> makefile build easily enough.)
> As moving the arguments around would just be the following, I see no reason to
> just do so.
Fair enough. I'm inclined to include that change only in v16, though.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, andres@anarazel.de, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Bugs in ecpg's macro mechanism
In-Reply-To: <1071980.1713231214@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox