pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon.riggs@enterprisedb.com>
Subject: Re: logical replication of truncate command with trigger causes Assert
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2021 19:58:56 -0400
Message-ID: <1254157.1623196736@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CBED95D4-5072-4A16-9271-72AB73478817@enterprisedb.com>
References: <B4A3AF82-79ED-4F4C-A4E5-CD2622098972@enterprisedb.com>
	<1250962.1623192946@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<CBED95D4-5072-4A16-9271-72AB73478817@enterprisedb.com>

Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> On Jun 8, 2021, at 3:55 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I suppose that either apply_dispatch or LogicalRepApplyLoop needs to
>> grow some more snapshot management logic, but I've not looked at that
>> code much, so I don't have an opinion on just where to add it.

> I was looking at those for other reasons prior to hitting this bug.

After looking at it a bit, I see a couple of options:

1. Just wrap the call of ExecuteTruncateGuts with
PushActiveSnapshot(GetTransactionSnapshot()) and PopActiveSnapshot().

2. Decide that we ought to ensure that a snapshot exists throughout
most of this code.  It's not entirely obvious to me that there is no
code path reachable from, say, apply_handle_truncate's collection of
relation OIDs that needs a snapshot.  If we went for that, I'd think
the right solution is to do PushActiveSnapshot right after each
ensure_transaction call, and then PopActiveSnapshot on the way out of
the respective subroutine.  We could then drop the snapshot management
calls that are currently associated with the executor state.

> My purpose was to figure out how to get the code to respect
> privileges.  Perhaps the solution to these two issues is related.
> I don't know yet.

Doesn't seem tremendously related.  But yeah, there is Stuff That
Is Missing in these code paths.

			regards, tom lane





view thread (15+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <1254157.1623196736@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../1254157.1623196736@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/1254157.1623196736@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org, peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com, simon.riggs@enterprisedb.com
  Subject: Re: logical replication of truncate command with trigger causes Assert
  In-Reply-To: <1254157.1623196736@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox