From: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Small locking bugs in hs
Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 22:10:09 +0000
Message-ID: <1261951809.18116.458.camel@ebony> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200912272012.32556.andres@anarazel.de>
References: <200912272012.32556.andres@anarazel.de>
On Sun, 2009-12-27 at 20:12 +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
> While unlikely to cause issues two new LWLockAcquire calls use the wrong
> locking mode.
> Patch attached.
It's important to explain why you think something is a bug, rather than
make that claim on its own.
The locking mode was intentional, though not documented either way.
However, I think I see a different issue with conflict handling, so
looking at this again was worthwhile, thanks. Will come back with more
over next few days.
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: simon@2ndQuadrant.com, andres@anarazel.de
Subject: Re: Small locking bugs in hs
In-Reply-To: <1261951809.18116.458.camel@ebony>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox