From: Andrey Klychkov <aaklychkov@mail.ru>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Cc: Victor Yegorov <vyegorov@gmail.com>
Subject: Re[2]: Alter index rename concurrently to
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 12:44:30 +0300
Message-ID: <1531907070.621013080@f382.i.mail.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6cf6b35f-b730-60fc-bab7-82699dca59ed@2ndquadrant.com>
References: <1531767486.432607658@f357.i.mail.ru>
<1531828116.497549417@f411.i.mail.ru>
<6cf6b35f-b730-60fc-bab7-82699dca59ed@2ndquadrant.com>
>Среда, 18 июля 2018, 12:21 +03:00 от Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>:
>
>If we think the lower lock level is OK, then we should just use
>it always.
>
Hi, I absolutely agree with you.
If lower locking is safe and possible to be used by default in renaming it will be great.
What stage is solving of this issue? Does anybody do it?
Thank you!
--
Kind regards,
Andrey Klychkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: aaklychkov@mail.ru, peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com, vyegorov@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Re[2]: Alter index rename concurrently to
In-Reply-To: <1531907070.621013080@f382.i.mail.ru>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox