pg.ddx.io pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive
help / color / mirror / Atom feed From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
Cc: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Intermittent buildfarm failures on wrasse
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2022 21:53:34 -0400
Message-ID: <1572437.1649987614@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw )
In-Reply-To: <CAH2-WznQ2j3n9QwfJ5Cp6RAPfbYCkh-Bgj2Vyk6Qh_HwFULRYw@mail.gmail.com >
References: <1364997.1649893086@sss.pgh.pa.us >
<CAH2-WzkUGqFNXhnFRbVG4xfTo3WpapcdRaH4hQSTrNvDgYvYoQ@mail.gmail.com >
<1365924.1649893883@sss.pgh.pa.us >
<CAH2-Wzn2Obp90oyZa5HN26rzG8ozzHM3dgkpLcsVzxTR+jK5NQ@mail.gmail.com >
<1374062.1649896550@sss.pgh.pa.us >
<20220414010505.s7z24jxrfsjbzz7l@alap3.anarazel.de >
<1401379.1649899392@sss.pgh.pa.us >
<20220414015112.yhruzx3dbjnz4pji@alap3.anarazel.de >
<20220414025122.GA808845@rfd.leadboat.com >
<1486022.1649952083@sss.pgh.pa.us >
<20220414161850.ibqkevxcv6a7vdxg@alap3.anarazel.de >
<1521388.1649953580@sss.pgh.pa.us >
<1547912.1649971995@sss.pgh.pa.us >
<CAH2-Wz=DHY2LV7=2aVd=qz6AbQhFK7KJRNL5ZwgB7dyno_gzdg@mail.gmail.com >
<1553951.1649975018@sss.pgh.pa.us >
<CAH2-WzngTjUk_65ESmrMf40WTqasrmWG0gpwnvcN+mXsoXT7qQ@mail.gmail.com >
<CAH2-WznXXkkfE_y9ieaHkEQj31HeMAqJBtJPmDY+EpyVg1QywQ@mail.gmail.com >
<1570894.1649986347@sss.pgh.pa.us >
<CAH2-WznQ2j3n9QwfJ5Cp6RAPfbYCkh-Bgj2Vyk6Qh_HwFULRYw@mail.gmail.com >
Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> writes:
> Anyway, I suppose it's possible that problems reappeared here due to
> some other patch. Something else could have broken Andres' earlier
> band aid solution (which was to set synchronous_commit=on in
> test_setup).
That band-aid only addressed the situation of someone having turned
off synchronous_commit in the first place; which is not the case
on wrasse or most/all other buildfarm animals. Whatever we're
dealing with here is something independent of that.
> Is there any patch that could plausibly have had that effect, whose
> commit fits with our timeline for the problems seen on wrasse ?
I already enumerated my suspects, back at the top of this thread.
regards, tom lane
view thread (88+ messages) latest in thread
Message-ID: <1572437.1649987614@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink: ../1572437.1649987614@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on: postgresql.org/message-id/1572437.1649987614@sss.pgh.pa.us
copy link · copy postgr.es
reply Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, pg@bowt.ie, andres@anarazel.de, noah@leadboat.com, dgrowleyml@gmail.com, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Intermittent buildfarm failures on wrasse
In-Reply-To: <1572437.1649987614@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox