From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Proposed refactoring of planner header files
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 16:37:42 -0500
Message-ID: <15776.1548711462@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190128211231.7xtkq4lzlt44mmr2@alap3.anarazel.de>
References: <11460.1548706639@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<20190128203229.yreabsq6kinxdnh5@alap3.anarazel.de>
<13179.1548708622@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<20190128210211.4is52ckj2voz2bdl@alap3.anarazel.de>
<20190128211231.7xtkq4lzlt44mmr2@alap3.anarazel.de>
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2019-01-28 13:02:11 -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
>> It's not required by C99, it however is required by C11. But a lot of
>> compilers have allowed it as an extension for a long time (like before
>> C99), unless suppressed by some option.
> Hm, it's only in gcc 4.6, so that's probably too recent.
Yeah, I tried it with RHEL6's gcc 4.4.7, and it doesn't work
(and AFAICS there is no option that would make it work). A lot
of the buildfarm is running compilers older than that.
I fear we're still 10 years away from being able to demand C11
support ...
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, andres@anarazel.de, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Proposed refactoring of planner header files
In-Reply-To: <15776.1548711462@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox