From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Cc: Erik Wienhold <ewie@ewie.name>
Subject: Re: Regression with large XML data input
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 14:57:29 -0400
Message-ID: <1691195.1753383449@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1685956.1753380629@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <aIGknLuc8b8ega2X@paquier.xyz>
<1569825.1753327718@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<1685956.1753380629@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes:
>>> A customer has reported a regression with the parsing of rather large
>>> XML data, introduced by the set of backpatches done with f68d6aabb7e2
>>> & friends.
BTW, further testing shows that the same failure occurs at
f68d6aabb7e2^. So AFAICS, the answer as to why the behavior
changed there is that it didn't.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, michael@paquier.xyz, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org, ewie@ewie.name
Subject: Re: Regression with large XML data input
In-Reply-To: <1691195.1753383449@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox