From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: ClonedConstraint typedef is dead code?
Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 17:27:28 -0400
Message-ID: <17150.1557955648@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190515191940.GA6777@alvherre.pgsql>
References: <20190515191940.GA6777@alvherre.pgsql>
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 2019-May-15, Tom Lane wrote:
>> catalog/pg_constraint.h defines a typedef ClonedConstraint,
>> which AFAICS is no longer referenced anywhere. Is there a
>> reason not to remove it?
> Oh, I didn't realize it had become completely unused! It was used for
> FK creation in partitioned tables, but we rewrote that code completely
> and I don't foresee needing that struct for anything in the future, so
> it seems safe to remove.
Thanks, done.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: ClonedConstraint typedef is dead code?
In-Reply-To: <17150.1557955648@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox