pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Cc: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: pg_trigger.tgparentid
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 16:59:38 -0500
Message-ID: <17506.1581976778@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200217215641.GA29784@alvherre.pgsql>
References: <20200217215641.GA29784@alvherre.pgsql>

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> As mentioned in https://postgr.es/m/20191231194759.GA24692@alvherre.pgsql
> I propose to add a new column to pg_trigger, which allows us to remove a
> pg_depend scan when cloning triggers when adding/attaching partitions.
> (It's not that I think the scan is a performance problem, but rather
> than notionally we try not to depend on pg_depend contents for this kind
> of semantic derivation.)

It'd be nice if the term "parent trigger" were defined somewhere in
this.  Seems all right otherwise.

			regards, tom lane





view thread (10+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <17506.1581976778@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../17506.1581976778@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/17506.1581976778@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org, amitlangote09@gmail.com
  Subject: Re: pg_trigger.tgparentid
  In-Reply-To: <17506.1581976778@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox