pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Implement targetlist SRFs using ROWS FROM() (was Changed SRF in targetlist handling)
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 13:06:20 -0500
Message-ID: <19999.1484849180@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170118221154.aldebi7yyjvds5qa@alap3.anarazel.de>
References: <837.1484680521@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<12780.1484747004@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<20170118191924.25lfp6rd6y3kw5sa@alap3.anarazel.de>
	<13690.1484767452@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<20170118193420.znochutmnzusd636@alap3.anarazel.de>
	<15814.1484769612@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<460325A6-EF35-4A29-A1A0-EEDC3EDCF750@anarazel.de>
	<22709.1484771072@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<20170118214702.54b2mdbxce5piwv5@alap3.anarazel.de>
	<1080.1484776606@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<20170118221154.aldebi7yyjvds5qa@alap3.anarazel.de>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-hackers>

Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2017-01-18 16:56:46 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
>> I have not actually looked at 0003 at all yet.  So yeah, please post
>> for review after you're done rebasing.

> Here's a rebased and lightly massaged version.

I've read through this and made some minor improvements, mostly additional
comment cleanup.  One thing I wanted to ask about:

@@ -4303,7 +4303,7 @@ inline_function(Oid funcid, Oid result_type, Oid result_collid,
 
     /*
      * Forget it if the function is not SQL-language or has other showstopper
-     * properties.  (The nargs check is just paranoia.)
+     * properties.  (The nargs and retset checks are just paranoia.)
      */
     if (funcform->prolang != SQLlanguageId ||
         funcform->prosecdef ||

I thought this change was simply wrong, and removed it; AFAIK it's
perfectly possible to get here for set-returning functions, since
the planner does expression simplification long before it worries
about splitting out SRFs.  Did you have a reason to think differently?

Other than that possible point, I think the attached is committable.

			regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Attachments:

  [application/x-gzip] no-srfs-in-tlists-cleanup-2.patch.gz (27.7K, ../19999.1484849180@sss.pgh.pa.us/2-no-srfs-in-tlists-cleanup-2.patch.gz)
  download

view thread (110+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <19999.1484849180@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../19999.1484849180@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/19999.1484849180@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, andres@anarazel.de, robertmhaas@gmail.com
  Subject: Re: Implement targetlist SRFs using ROWS FROM() (was Changed SRF in targetlist handling)
  In-Reply-To: <19999.1484849180@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox