From: Guillaume Smet <guillaume.smet@gmail.com>
To: Petr Jelinek <pjmodos@pjmodos.net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: GRANT ON ALL IN schema
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:25:31 +0200
Message-ID: <1d4e0c10906170925o5001f808j8e4e49b5c620c788@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A3904CC.1020105@pjmodos.net>
References: <4A37BF63.50008@pjmodos.net>
<200906171644.53717.peter_e@gmx.net>
<25515.1245248104@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<200906171744.24456.peter_e@gmx.net>
<26370.1245250052@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<4A3904CC.1020105@pjmodos.net>
2009/6/17 Petr Jelinek <pjmodos@pjmodos.net>:
> I agree that Default ACLs are more important and I already offered Stephen
> help on that. But I've seen countless requests for granting on all tables to
> a user and I already got some positive feedback outside of the list, so I
> believe there is demand for this. Also to paraphrase you Tom, by that logic
> you can tell people to write half of administration functionality as plpgsql
> functions.
Indeed.
How to do default ACLs and wildcards for GRANT is by far the most
common question asked by our customers. And they don't understand why
it's not by default in PostgreSQL.
Installing a script/function for that on every database is just painful.
--
Guillaume
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: guillaume.smet@gmail.com, pjmodos@pjmodos.net, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, peter_e@gmx.net
Subject: Re: GRANT ON ALL IN schema
In-Reply-To: <1d4e0c10906170925o5001f808j8e4e49b5c620c788@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox