From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Petr Jelinek <pjmodos@pjmodos.net>
Subject: Re: GRANT ON ALL IN schema
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:47:32 -0400
Message-ID: <26370.1245250052@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200906171744.24456.peter_e@gmx.net>
References: <4A37BF63.50008@pjmodos.net>
<200906171644.53717.peter_e@gmx.net>
<25515.1245248104@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<200906171744.24456.peter_e@gmx.net>
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Why don't we tell people to write a plpgsql loop for the schema.* case as
> well?
Indeed, why not? This all seems much more like gilding the lily than
delivering useful new capability. The default-ACL stuff that Stephen
is working on seems far more important in practice.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, peter_e@gmx.net, pjmodos@pjmodos.net
Subject: Re: GRANT ON ALL IN schema
In-Reply-To: <26370.1245250052@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox