From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Guillaume Smet <guillaume.smet@gmail.com>
Cc: Petr Jelinek <pjmodos@pjmodos.net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Subject: Re: GRANT ON ALL IN schema
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 10:21:36 +0300
Message-ID: <200906181021.36835.peter_e@gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <603c8f070906171027v29124841g1a73388f24a84540@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4A37BF63.50008@pjmodos.net>
<1d4e0c10906170925o5001f808j8e4e49b5c620c788@mail.gmail.com>
<603c8f070906171027v29124841g1a73388f24a84540@mail.gmail.com>
On Wednesday 17 June 2009 20:27:20 Robert Haas wrote:
> What to do about wildcards is a stickier wicket, and maybe we need to
> decide that first, but I really don't think we should be discouraging
> anyone from investigating this stuff and trying to come up with good
> solutions. There will always be some people for whom a custom
> PL/pgsql function that directly accesses the catalog tables is the
> only workable answer, but we can make PostgreSQL a whole lot easier to
> use by reducing the need to do that for simple cases.
I'm all for investigating it. I just have my doubts that "grant on all tables
in schema X" is a sufficiently general use case, even if you only concentrate
on the simple cases.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: peter_e@gmx.net, robertmhaas@gmail.com, guillaume.smet@gmail.com, pjmodos@pjmodos.net, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
Subject: Re: GRANT ON ALL IN schema
In-Reply-To: <200906181021.36835.peter_e@gmx.net>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox