From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Return of the Solaris vacuum polling problem -- anyone remember this?
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 15:25:13 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <201008231925.o7NJPDD16301@momjian.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1282590106-sup-7578@alvh.no-ip.org>
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of lun ago 23 14:55:55 -0400 2010:
>
> > OK, I have attached a proposed patch to improve this. I moved the
> > pg_clog mention to a new paragraph and linked it to the reason the
> > default is relatively low.
> >
> > Comments?
>
> I think the new para doesn't make much sense, in context. Why does it
> say "freeze"? How can we expect users to understand how that is
> related to this parameter?
I have removed the freeze mention per Tom's comment and posted an
updated version that removes the 'freeze' wording. Are there other
changes needed?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: bruce@momjian.us, alvherre@commandprompt.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, josh@agliodbs.com
Subject: Re: Return of the Solaris vacuum polling problem -- anyone remember this?
In-Reply-To: <201008231925.o7NJPDD16301@momjian.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox