pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Ports <drkp@csail.mit.edu>
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
Subject: Repeated PredicateLockRelation calls during seqscan
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 00:58:50 -0400
Message-ID: <20110622045850.GN83336@csail.mit.edu> (raw)

I was looking at ExecSeqScan today and noticed that it invokes
PredicateLockRelation each time it's called, i.e. for each tuple
returned. Any reason we shouldn't skip that call if
rs_relpredicatelocked is already set, as in the attached patch?

That would save us a bit of overhead, since checking that flag is
cheaper than doing a hash lookup in the local predicate lock table
before bailing out.

Dan

-- 
Dan R. K. Ports              MIT CSAIL                http://drkp.net/

Attachments:

predlock-seqscan.patch (text/x-diff, 823B) download diff --git a/src/backend/executor/nodeSeqscan.c b/src/backend/executor/nodeSeqscan.c index f356874..32a8f56 100644 --- a/src/backend/executor/nodeSeqscan.c +++ b/src/backend/executor/nodeSeqscan.c @@ -113,9 +113,13 @@ SeqRecheck(SeqScanState *node, TupleTableSlot *slot) TupleTableSlot * ExecSeqScan(SeqScanState *node) { - PredicateLockRelation(node->ss_currentRelation, - node->ss_currentScanDesc->rs_snapshot); - node->ss_currentScanDesc->rs_relpredicatelocked = true; + if (!node->ss_currentScanDesc->rs_relpredicatelocked) + { + PredicateLockRelation(node->ss_currentRelation, + node->ss_currentScanDesc->rs_snapshot); + node->ss_currentScanDesc->rs_relpredicatelocked = true; + } + return ExecScan((ScanState *) node, (ExecScanAccessMtd) SeqNext, (ExecScanRecheckMtd) SeqRecheck);

view thread (13+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20110622045850.GN83336@csail.mit.edu>
Permalink:  ../20110622045850.GN83336@csail.mit.edu/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20110622045850.GN83336@csail.mit.edu

 ·  · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: drkp@csail.mit.edu, Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov
  Subject: Re: Repeated PredicateLockRelation calls during seqscan
  In-Reply-To: <20110622045850.GN83336@csail.mit.edu>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox