pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
Cc: Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org>
Cc: PgHacker <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [v9.3] Row-Level Security
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 13:59:26 -0300
Message-ID: <20121203165926.GG5276@alvh.no-ip.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121203160935.GB16951@fetter.org>
References: <CADyhKSUFcMcwup1=ydvwghiy21Vn_OGzO-rX-VCBO1CSDNNTMQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20121018181956.GL3763@alvh.no-ip.org>
	<CA+TgmoY6m-HCQfX8Qz8V5c9wbzqFU7GSpWaBDLcpb4o2sWtcEQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADyhKSXsN5xGFPsx8fXkOxkuaSePLFd4BFcdxvE5KfTK6wFBmw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADyhKSUBRFuXpgy=NjMgX2H57aRh4pQ7cDhLcpn=ThCGCwaPgg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADyhKSU4jOAwZ-tWEeBUFzis2dN9NmwxWwLgYnHdfYWF25p5-Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<20121203152521.GA16951@fetter.org>
	<CADyhKSWDXFx3iy8UzhC1x4ubcEtOp7q+qK5CwD-uFanHCe22Xw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+U5nML-c6Hv4ME4xM_Es7f4e9A04vgr_8VGXAK7sBx602T52Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<20121203160935.GB16951@fetter.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-hackers>

David Fetter escribió:
> On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 03:41:47PM +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> > On 3 December 2012 15:36, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp> wrote:
> > > 2012/12/3 David Fetter <david@fetter.org>:
> > >> On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 03:20:28PM +0100, Kohei KaiGai wrote:
> > >>> > However, UPDATE / DELETE support is not perfect right now.
> > >>> > In case when we try to update / delete a table with inherited
> > >>> > children and RETURNING clause was added, is loses right
> > >>> > references to the pseudo columns, even though it works fine
> > >>> > without inherited children.
> > >>> >
> > >>> The attached patch fixed this known problem.
> > >>
> > >> This patch no longer applies to git master.  Any chance of a rebase?
> > >>
> > > OK, I'll rebese it.
> > 
> > No chunk failures, its just fuzz.
> 
> I must have done something wrong.
> 
> I downloaded the patch from the web email archives, then ran "git
> apply" on it, and got this:

git apply is much stricter than other tools; if the patch requires a
merge, it doesn't try.  Try applying it with "patch -p1 < /path/to/patch"
(this is what I always use)

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers



view thread (165+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20121203165926.GG5276@alvh.no-ip.org>
Permalink:  ../20121203165926.GG5276@alvh.no-ip.org/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20121203165926.GG5276@alvh.no-ip.org

 · 

reply
Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, david@fetter.org, simon@2ndQuadrant.com, kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp, robertmhaas@gmail.com, dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, fgp@phlo.org
  Subject: Re: [v9.3] Row-Level Security
  In-Reply-To: <20121203165926.GG5276@alvh.no-ip.org>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox