pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: shared memory based stat collector (was: Sharing record typmods between backends)
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 09:36:10 -0700
Message-ID: <20170814163610.pgdzwygma2q6csi6@alap3.anarazel.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <10227.1502728119@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <20170814005656.d5tvz464qkmz66tq@alap3.anarazel.de>
	<32138.1502675970@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<CA+TgmobQVbz4K_+RSmiM9HeRKpy3vS5xnbkL95gSEnWijzprKQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<9714.1502727365@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<CA+TgmoZcOASyjF5MZ+r-uBxO4kjRONq4afe=vuaRCChw=E3HFw@mail.gmail.com>
	<10227.1502728119@sss.pgh.pa.us>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-hackers>

On 2017-08-14 12:28:39 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> > On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> >> Just FYI, the only values being reported by buildfarm animals are
> >> "posix", "sysv", and "windows".  So while mmap may be a thing,
> >> it's an untested thing.
> 
> > I'm pretty sure I dev-tested it before committing anything, but,
> > certainly, having ongoing BF coverage woudn't be a bad thing.
> 
> Looking closer, the reason those are the only reported values is
> that those are the only possible results from initdb's
> choose_dsm_implementation().  So the real question here is whether
> "mmap" should be considered to dominate "sysv" if it's available.

No mmap isn't a good option - it's file backed mmap, rather than
anonymous mmap. To my knowledge there's no good portable way to use
anonymous mmap to share memory across processes unless established
before a fork().


> If so, why isn't choose_dsm_implementation() trying it; and if not,
> why are we carrying it?

I think the idea was that there might be platforms that require it, but
...


Greetings,

Andres Freund


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers



view thread (23+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20170814163610.pgdzwygma2q6csi6@alap3.anarazel.de>
Permalink:  ../20170814163610.pgdzwygma2q6csi6@alap3.anarazel.de/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20170814163610.pgdzwygma2q6csi6@alap3.anarazel.de

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: andres@anarazel.de, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, robertmhaas@gmail.com, alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com, dilipbalaut@gmail.com
  Subject: Re: shared memory based stat collector (was: Sharing record typmods between backends)
  In-Reply-To: <20170814163610.pgdzwygma2q6csi6@alap3.anarazel.de>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox