pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Vik Fearing <vik.fearing@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Fix for FETCH FIRST syntax problems
Date: Sun, 20 May 2018 18:56:28 -0400
Message-ID: <20180520225628.GZ27724@tamriel.snowman.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAH2-Wz=XCtrYgKy2QhToivePvuSpx3Eteo7TYrzZPsom-w0VdQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <877enz476l.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk>
	<22981.1526770675@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<03da97fc-9d6b-cbe1-c28f-cee7c1ba5c38@2ndquadrant.com>
	<25267.1526773270@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<CAH2-Wz=XCtrYgKy2QhToivePvuSpx3Eteo7TYrzZPsom-w0VdQ@mail.gmail.com>

Greetings,

* Peter Geoghegan (pg@bowt.ie) wrote:
> Whether or not Andrew's patch is formally classified as a bug fix is
> subjective. I'm inclined to accept it as a bug fix, but I also think
> that it shouldn't matter very much. The practical implication is that
> I don't think it's completely out of the question to back-patch, but
> AFAICT nobody else thinks it's out of the question anyway. Why bother
> debating something that's inconsequential?

Just to be clear, based on what I saw on IRC, this specifically came out
of someone complaining that it didn't work and caused difficulty for
them.  As such, my inclination on this would be to back-patch it, but
we'd need to be sure to test it and be confident that it won't break
things which worked before.

Thanks!

Stephen

Attachments:

  signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 818B) download

view thread (19+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20180520225628.GZ27724@tamriel.snowman.net>
Permalink:  ../20180520225628.GZ27724@tamriel.snowman.net/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20180520225628.GZ27724@tamriel.snowman.net

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: sfrost@snowman.net, pg@bowt.ie, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, vik.fearing@2ndquadrant.com, andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk
  Subject: Re: Fix for FETCH FIRST syntax problems
  In-Reply-To: <20180520225628.GZ27724@tamriel.snowman.net>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox