pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Fixing findDependentObjects()'s dependency on scan order (regressions in DROP diagnostic messages)
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 23:01:09 -0300
Message-ID: <201901190201.fmtf2fdn2rec@alvherre.pgsql> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAH2-Wzk-57Bw6PazMEVMLn2T5enHMoq-PqXR8LGxjJO0kgm0+w@mail.gmail.com>

On 2019-Jan-18, Peter Geoghegan wrote:

> On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 3:34 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

> > * There is still instability in which object you get told to drop
> > when attempting to drop an index partition or trigger, as a consequence
> > of there being two possible DEPENDENCY_INTERNAL_AUTO targets.  I still
> > feel that the right fix there involves changing the design for what
> > dependency types we store, but I've not worked on it yet.
> 
> I thought that your ALTER OBJECT DEPENDS ON EXTENSION example made the
> case for fixing that directly inarguable. I'm slightly surprised that
> you're not fully convinced of this already. Have I missed some
> subtlety?

I agree that it needs fixed, but I don't think we know what to change it
*to*.  The suggestion to use one AUTO and one INTERNAL seems to me to
break some use cases.  Maybe one INTERNAL and one INTERNAL_AUTO works
well, not sure.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services




view thread (84+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <201901190201.fmtf2fdn2rec@alvherre.pgsql>
Permalink:  ../201901190201.fmtf2fdn2rec@alvherre.pgsql/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/201901190201.fmtf2fdn2rec@alvherre.pgsql

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, pg@bowt.ie, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
  Subject: Re: Fixing findDependentObjects()'s dependency on scan order (regressions in DROP diagnostic messages)
  In-Reply-To: <201901190201.fmtf2fdn2rec@alvherre.pgsql>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox