From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Fixing findDependentObjects()'s dependency on scan order (regressions in DROP diagnostic messages)
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 17:04:45 -0300
Message-ID: <20190211200445.GA30250@alvherre.pgsql> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <10442.1549914403@sss.pgh.pa.us>
On 2019-Feb-11, Tom Lane wrote:
> I've pushed this now. I made one additional change, which was to fix
> things so that if both an INTERNAL and an EXTENSION dependency exist,
> the first loop will reliably complain about the EXTENSION dependency.
> It only takes one more if-test to do that now that we're postponing
> the error report till after the loop, and this way we don't need to
> split hairs about how likely it is for both to exist.
>
> I think we're done with this thread, though I still need to look at
> the problem I complained of in <26527.1549572789@sss.pgh.pa.us>.
Thanks for taking care of this!
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, pg@bowt.ie
Subject: Re: Fixing findDependentObjects()'s dependency on scan order (regressions in DROP diagnostic messages)
In-Reply-To: <20190211200445.GA30250@alvherre.pgsql>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox