pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Jamison, Kirk <k.jamison@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: 'jesper.pedersen@redhat.com' <jesper.pedersen@redhat.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade: Pass -j down to vacuumdb
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 14:08:42 -0300
Message-ID: <201901251708.ha3sgz7dn4rm@alvherre.pgsql> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aeea26f9-f42b-8570-9ee1-304c4f33281b@2ndquadrant.com>

On 2019-Jan-25, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> On 25/01/2019 11:28, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > based on that linking the value used by pg_upgrade and vacuumdb is a
> > bad concept in my opinion, and the patch should be rejected.  More
> > documentation on pg_upgrade side to explain that a bit better could be
> > a good idea though, as it is perfectly possible to use your own
> > post-upgrade script or rewrite partially the generated one.
> 
> Right.  pg_upgrade doesn't actually call vacuumdb.  It creates a script
> that you may use.  The script itself contains a comment that says, if
> you want to do this as fast as possible, don't use this script.  That
> comment could be enhanced to suggest the use of the -j option.

So let's have it write with a $VACUUMDB_OPTS variable, which is by
default defined as empty but with a comment suggesting that maybe the
user wants to add the -j option.  This way, if they have to edit it,
they only have to edit the VACUUMDB_OPTS line instead of each of the two
vacuumdb lines.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services




view thread (44+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <201901251708.ha3sgz7dn4rm@alvherre.pgsql>
Permalink:  ../201901251708.ha3sgz7dn4rm@alvherre.pgsql/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/201901251708.ha3sgz7dn4rm@alvherre.pgsql

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com, michael@paquier.xyz, k.jamison@jp.fujitsu.com, jesper.pedersen@redhat.com, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org, bruce@momjian.us
  Subject: Re: pg_upgrade: Pass -j down to vacuumdb
  In-Reply-To: <201901251708.ha3sgz7dn4rm@alvherre.pgsql>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox