pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: New EXPLAIN option: ALL
Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 11:05:31 -0400
Message-ID: <20190515150531.GA12534@alvherre.pgsql> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190513055112.GA24409@fetter.org>

On 2019-May-13, David Fetter wrote:

> I tried changing it to EXEC (EXPLAIN EXECUTE is already a thing), but
> got a giant flock of reduce-reduce conflicts along with a few
> shift-reduce conflicts.

After eyeballing the giant patch set you sent[1], I think EXEC is a
horrible keyword to use -- IMO it should either be the complete word
EXECUTE, or we should pick some other word.  I realize that we do not
want to have different sets of keywords when using the legacy syntax (no
parens) vs.  new-style (with parens), but maybe we should just not
support the EXECUTE keyword in the legacy syntax; there's already a
number of options we don't support in the legacy syntax (BUFFERS,
TIMING), so this isn't much of a stretch.

IOW if we want to change ANALYZE to EXECUTE, I propose we change it in
the new-style syntax only and not the legacy one.  So:

EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT ...	-- legacy syntax
EXPLAIN (EXECUTE) SELECT ...	-- new-style
EXPLAIN (ANALYZE) SELECT ...	-- we still support ANALYZE as an alias, for compatibility

this should not cause a conflict with EXPLAIN EXECUTE, so these all
should work:

EXPLAIN ANALYZE EXECUTE ...
EXPLAIN (EXECUTE) EXECUTE ...
EXPLAIN (ANALYZE) EXECUTE ...


[1] I think if you just leave out the GUC print from the changes, it
becomes a reasonable patch series.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services





view thread (49+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20190515150531.GA12534@alvherre.pgsql>
Permalink:  ../20190515150531.GA12534@alvherre.pgsql/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20190515150531.GA12534@alvherre.pgsql

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, david@fetter.org, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, sfrost@snowman.net, andres@anarazel.de
  Subject: Re: New EXPLAIN option: ALL
  In-Reply-To: <20190515150531.GA12534@alvherre.pgsql>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox