pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <masahiko.sawada@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: PG 13 release notes, first draft
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 21:30:50 -0400
Message-ID: <20200730013050.GA30116@momjian.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAH2-Wzn3kwQm_pe6g2=ki+P7+ZRqH5GvFGn6SWfv_j7UUgcLdQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20200626202036.GA5474@alvherre.pgsql>
	<20200626202326.GA5823@alvherre.pgsql>
	<20200626222423.GC3337@momjian.us>
	<CAH2-Wzn3kwQm_pe6g2=ki+P7+ZRqH5GvFGn6SWfv_j7UUgcLdQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 03:34:22PM -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> Hi Bruce,
> 
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 3:24 PM Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> > Patch attached and applied to PG 13.
> 
> I committed the hash_mem_multiplier GUC to Postgres 13 just now.
> 
> There should be a note about this in the Postgres 13 release notes,
> for the usual reasons. More importantly, the "Allow hash aggregation
> to use disk storage for large aggregation result sets" feature should
> reference the new GUC directly. Users should be advised that the GUC
> may be useful in cases where they upgrade and experience a performance
> regression linked to slower hash aggregation. Just including a
> documentation link for the GUC would be very helpful.

I came up with the attached patch.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             https://enterprisedb.com

  The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee

Attachments:

hash.diff (text/x-diff, 786B) download diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/release-13.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/release-13.sgml new file mode 100644 index 18e6497..2586645 *** a/doc/src/sgml/release-13.sgml --- b/doc/src/sgml/release-13.sgml *************** Author: Jeff Davis <jdavis@postgresql.or *** 649,655 **** <para> Previously, hash aggregation was avoided if it was expected to use ! more than <xref linkend="guc-work-mem"/> memory. </para> </listitem> --- 649,657 ---- <para> Previously, hash aggregation was avoided if it was expected to use ! more than <xref linkend="guc-work-mem"/> memory. To use more ! memory for hash query operations, increase <xref ! linkend="guc-hash-mem-multiplier"/>. </para> </listitem>

view thread (194+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20200730013050.GA30116@momjian.us>
Permalink:  ../20200730013050.GA30116@momjian.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20200730013050.GA30116@momjian.us

 ·  · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: bruce@momjian.us, pg@bowt.ie, alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, masahiko.sawada@2ndquadrant.com
  Subject: Re: PG 13 release notes, first draft
  In-Reply-To: <20200730013050.GA30116@momjian.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox