pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
To: Craig Ringer <craig.ringer@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: Matthieu Garrigues <matthieu.garrigues@gmail.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 13:27:50 -0300
Message-ID: <20210216162750.GA13534@alvherre.pgsql> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGRY4nxO2JafmwJMzwzHuQC_3sXNw+nKs5XQAHPZQd8Gy3SXmQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 2021-Feb-16, Craig Ringer wrote:

> FWIW I'm also thinking of revising the docs to mostly use the term
> "pipeline" instead of "batch". Use "pipelining and batching" in the chapter
> topic, and mention "batch" in the index, and add a para that explains how
> to run batches on top of pipelining, but otherwise use the term "pipeline"
> not "batch".

Hmm, this is a good point.  It means I have a lot of API renaming to do.
I'll get on it now and come back with a proposal.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera       Valdivia, Chile





view thread (182+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20210216162750.GA13534@alvherre.pgsql>
Permalink:  ../20210216162750.GA13534@alvherre.pgsql/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20210216162750.GA13534@alvherre.pgsql

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org, craig.ringer@enterprisedb.com, matthieu.garrigues@gmail.com, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq
  In-Reply-To: <20210216162750.GA13534@alvherre.pgsql>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox