From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
To: k.jamison@fujitsu.com <k.jamison@fujitsu.com>
Cc: Craig Ringer <craig.ringer@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: Matthieu Garrigues <matthieu.garrigues@gmail.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2021 20:02:39 -0300
Message-ID: <20210308230239.GA2203@alvherre.pgsql> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210304015108.GA15670@alvherre.pgsql>
On 2021-Mar-03, 'Alvaro Herrera' wrote:
> I wonder if it would make sense to get rid of conn->last_query
> completely and just rely always on conn->cmd_queue_head, where the
> normal (non-pipeline) would use the first entry of the command queue.
> That might end up being simpler than pipeline mode "pretending" to take
> over ->last_query.
I experimented with this today and it appears to be a good change,
though I haven't been able to make everything work correctly yet.
--
Álvaro Herrera Valdivia, Chile
"Entristecido, Wutra (canción de Las Barreras)
echa a Freyr a rodar
y a nosotros al mar"
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org, k.jamison@fujitsu.com, craig.ringer@enterprisedb.com, matthieu.garrigues@gmail.com, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq
In-Reply-To: <20210308230239.GA2203@alvherre.pgsql>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox