pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: PG 14 release notes, first draft
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 17:37:52 -0400
Message-ID: <20210520213752.GF8971@momjian.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210520203507.GA21233@alvherre.pgsql>
References: <20210520195902.GE8971@momjian.us>
	<20210520203507.GA21233@alvherre.pgsql>

On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 04:35:07PM -0400, Álvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2021-May-20, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 02:55:18PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 03:44:46PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > > > | Reduce the default value of vacuum_cost_page_miss (Peter Geoghegan) 
> > > > > |  This new default better reflects current hardware capabilities. 
> > > > > Also say: the previous default was 10.
> > > > 
> > > > Uh, we didn't report the new value, so why report the old one?
> > > 
> > > Good point.
> > > For symmetry with this one, maybe the old and new values should be included?
> > 
> > Not sure.  Those values are kind of hard to understand, so I am afraid
> > there would be more confusion by mentioning them.
> > 
> > > |Change checkpoint_completion_target default to 0.9 (Stephen Frost)
> > > |The previous default was 0.5.
> > 
> > Uh, that one is frequently modified by users, to an extent I didn't
> > understand why we kept it at 0.5 for so long, which is why I mentioned
> > it.
> 
> You also mentioned 'md5' in the entry about password_encryption,
> remember?  I tend to agree with Justin: if it's not too much extra space
> to mention both values, let's just do that.  "Reduce the value of X to Y
> from Z.  The new default better reflects ..." seems OK to me.
> 
> I prefer "to Y from Z" rather than "from Z to Y", because then the new
> value appears first, which seems a tiny improvement in readability,
> though the phrase is in the opposite order of traditional.  Also it
> seems better than "change value of X to Y.  The previous default was Z"
> because it then becomes a little more verbose than really needed.  But
> maybe that's OK too.

I went with this text:

	Reduce the default value of <varname><xref
	linkend="guc-vacuum-cost-page-miss"></varname> from 10 milliseconds to 2
	(Peter Geoghegan)

I think with numbers, and the fact we are saying "decrease" havint them
in the from/to order is best.  If this was non-numeric, like to scram
from md5, it would make more sense to use to/from.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EDB                                      https://enterprisedb.com

  If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.






view thread (173+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20210520213752.GF8971@momjian.us>
Permalink:  ../20210520213752.GF8971@momjian.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20210520213752.GF8971@momjian.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: bruce@momjian.us, alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org, pryzby@telsasoft.com
  Subject: Re: PG 14 release notes, first draft
  In-Reply-To: <20210520213752.GF8971@momjian.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox