From: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
To: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Cc: Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar.ahmad@gmail.com>
Cc: Arne Roland <A.Roland@index.de>
Cc: David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Cc: Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90@gmail.com>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>
Subject: Re: a misbehavior of partition row movement (?)
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2022 12:16:23 +0800
Message-ID: <20220118041623.ffxy2gphluossyk5@jrouhaud> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+HiwqH2gWBDUotwtnY7qnp+K5j0J4tzUDycqcePA7Yy1s4MbQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+HiwqF2PeNde2Qc8AH_D+KX7to_f94KERAKmZfiSejU-tprZA@mail.gmail.com>
<202201111123.2jgx5lnzecdf@alvherre.pgsql>
<CA+HiwqH2gWBDUotwtnY7qnp+K5j0J4tzUDycqcePA7Yy1s4MbQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 08:40:54PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
>
> Okay, I created versions of the patch series for branches 13 and 14
> (.txt files). The one for HEAD is also re-attached.
FYI The patch failed today on FreeBSD, while it was previously quite stable on
all platforms (https://cirrus-ci.com/build/4551468081479680), with this error:
https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/6360787076775936/regress_diffs/src/test/recovery/tmp_chec...inline patch 1: /tmp/cirrus-ci-build/src/test/recovery/tmp_check/results/reloptions.out (+1/-1 lines) download inline-1.patchdiff -U3 /tmp/cirrus-ci-build/src/test/recovery/../regress/expected/reloptions.out /tmp/cirrus-ci-build/src/test/recovery/tmp_check/results/reloptions.out
--- /tmp/cirrus-ci-build/src/test/recovery/../regress/expected/reloptions.out 2022-01-18 00:12:52.533086000 +0000+++ /tmp/cirrus-ci-build/src/test/recovery/tmp_check/results/reloptions.out 2022-01-18 00:28:00.000524000 +0000@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@
SELECT pg_relation_size('reloptions_test') = 0;
?column?
----------
- t+ f
(1 row)
I'm not sure why this test failed as it doesn't seem like something impacted by
the patch, but I may have missed something as I only had a quick look at the
patch and discussion.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: rjuju123@gmail.com, amitlangote09@gmail.com, alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org, andrew@dunslane.net, ibrar.ahmad@gmail.com, A.Roland@index.de, david.g.johnston@gmail.com, sawada.mshk@gmail.com, peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com, rahilasyed90@gmail.com, tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com
Subject: Re: a misbehavior of partition row movement (?)
In-Reply-To: <20220118041623.ffxy2gphluossyk5@jrouhaud>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox