From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Cc: 李杰(慎追) <adger.lj@alibaba-inc.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org, 曾文旌(义从) <wenjing.zwj@alibaba-inc.com>
Cc: Zhihong Yu <zyu@yugabyte.com>
Subject: Re: CLUSTER on partitioned index
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 07:28:15 +0200
Message-ID: <202204260528.yfc7jqc64eas@alvherre.pgsql> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YmeAV6gG/7Xqhiba@paquier.xyz>
On 2022-Apr-26, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 16, 2022 at 08:58:50PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > Well, I am a bit annoyed that we don't actually check that a CLUSTER
> > command does not block when doing a CLUSTER on a partitioned table
> > while a lock is held on one of its partitions. So, attached is a
> > proposal of patch to improve the test coverage in this area.
>
> This was the last reason why this was listed as an open item, so,
> hearing nothing, I have applied this patch to add those extra tests,
> and switched the item as fixed.
Thank you!
--
Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org, michael@paquier.xyz, pryzby@telsasoft.com, adger.lj@alibaba-inc.com, wenjing.zwj@alibaba-inc.com, zyu@yugabyte.com
Subject: Re: CLUSTER on partitioned index
In-Reply-To: <202204260528.yfc7jqc64eas@alvherre.pgsql>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox