pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Cc: tender wang <tndrwang@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] Fix DETACH with FK pointing to a partitioned table fails
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 17:03:45 +0200
Message-ID: <20230810170345.26e41b05@karst> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230803090243.5ba3mapddthv6yhn@alvherre.pgsql>
References: <CAHewXNkL1QC_erA_7mkFHHAU9c56fa3oxuSvRt9cmtyZRY8Zhw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20230803090243.5ba3mapddthv6yhn@alvherre.pgsql>

On Thu, 3 Aug 2023 11:02:43 +0200
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:

> On 2023-Aug-03, tender wang wrote:
> 
> > I think  old "sub-FK" should not be dropped, that will be violates foreign
> > key constraint.  
> 
> Yeah, I've been playing more with the patch and it is definitely not
> doing the right things.  Just eyeballing the contents of pg_trigger and
> pg_constraint for partitions added by ALTER...ATTACH shows that the
> catalog contents are inconsistent with those added by CREATE TABLE
> PARTITION OF.

Well, as stated in my orignal message, at the patch helps understanding the
problem and sketch a possible solution. It definitely is not complete.

After DETACHing the table, we surely needs to check everything again and
recreating what is needed to keep the FK consistent.

But should we keep the FK after DETACH? Did you check the two other discussions
related to FK, self-FK & partition? Unfortunately, as Tender experienced, the
more we dig the more we find bugs. Moreover, the second one might seems
unsolvable and deserve a closer look. See:

* FK broken after DETACHing referencing part
  https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20230420144344.40744130%40karst
* Issue attaching a table to a partitioned table with an  auto-referenced
  foreign key
  https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20230707175859.17c91538%40karst






view thread (70+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20230810170345.26e41b05@karst>
Permalink:  ../20230810170345.26e41b05@karst/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20230810170345.26e41b05@karst

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: jgdr@dalibo.com, alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org, tndrwang@gmail.com
  Subject: Re: [BUG] Fix DETACH with FK pointing to a partitioned table fails
  In-Reply-To: <20230810170345.26e41b05@karst>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox