pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
To: John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: Kirk Wolak <wolakk@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: Eric Radman <ericshane@eradman.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add function to_oct
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2023 10:17:15 -0700
Message-ID: <20230815171715.GA2312399@nathanxps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFBsxsGkBKO276L476BWDgNGbkaH0S_ZcnevOK_0s=Dz0=Utrw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <Y6IyTQQ/TsD5wnsH@vm3.eradman.com>
	<5c260f97-d8c8-4a68-7498-022e550c6b10@enterprisedb.com>
	<CACLU5mQ9BGiMaTbS+EpvxngdEf35aX+Tcs31K8UJMkbxaZh5JA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20230725232426.GA2992317@nathanxps13>
	<20230726001656.GC2992317@nathanxps13>
	<20230726032917.GA3151386@nathanxps13>
	<20230815041129.GB2294364@nathanxps13>
	<CAFBsxsGkBKO276L476BWDgNGbkaH0S_ZcnevOK_0s=Dz0=Utrw@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 01:53:25PM +0700, John Naylor wrote:
> If we're not going to have a general SQL conversion function, here are some
> comments on the current patch.

I appreciate the review.

> +static char *convert_to_base(uint64 value, int base);
> 
> Not needed if the definition is above the callers.

Done.

> + * Workhorse for to_binary, to_oct, and to_hex.  Note that base must be
> either
> + * 2, 8, or 16.
> 
> Why wouldn't it work with any base <= 16?

You're right.  I changed this in v5.

> - *ptr = '\0';
> + Assert(base == 2 || base == 8 || base == 16);
> 
> + *ptr = '\0';
> 
> Spurious whitespace change?

I think this might just be a weird artifact of the diff algorithm.

> - char buf[32]; /* bigger than needed, but reasonable */
> + char   *buf = palloc(sizeof(uint64) * BITS_PER_BYTE + 1);
> 
> Why is this no longer allocated on the stack? Maybe needs a comment about
> the size calculation.

It really should be.  IIRC I wanted to avoid passing a pre-allocated buffer
to convert_to_base(), but I don't remember why.  I fixed this in v5.

> +static char *
> +convert_to_base(uint64 value, int base)
> 
> On my machine this now requires a function call and a DIV instruction, even
> though the patch claims not to support anything but a power of two. It's
> tiny enough to declare it inline so the compiler can specialize for each
> call site.

This was on my list of things to check before committing.  I assumed that
it would be automatically inlined, but given your analysis, I went ahead
and added the inline keyword.  My compiler took the hint and inlined the
function, and it used SHR instead of DIV instructions.  The machine code
for to_hex32/64 is still a couple of instructions longer than before
(probably because of the uint64 casts), but I don't know if we need to
worry about micro-optimizing these functions any further.

> +{ oid => '5101', descr => 'convert int4 number to binary',
> 
> Needs to be over 8000.

Done.

-- 
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

Attachments:

v5-0001-add-to_binary-and-to_oct.patch (text/x-diff, 8.9K) download From 2ad83f8781a013ef5e5e5a62a422f3b73c6c5f2d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2023 16:09:01 -0700 Subject: [PATCH v5 1/1] add to_binary() and to_oct() --- doc/src/sgml/func.sgml | 42 +++++++++++ src/backend/utils/adt/varlena.c | 103 +++++++++++++++++++------- src/include/catalog/pg_proc.dat | 12 +++ src/test/regress/expected/strings.out | 26 ++++++- src/test/regress/sql/strings.sql | 9 ++- 5 files changed, 163 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml index be2f54c914..23b5ac7457 100644 --- a/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml +++ b/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml @@ -3737,6 +3737,48 @@ repeat('Pg', 4) <returnvalue>PgPgPgPg</returnvalue> </para></entry> </row> + <row> + <entry role="func_table_entry"><para role="func_signature"> + <indexterm> + <primary>to_binary</primary> + </indexterm> + <function>to_binary</function> ( <type>integer</type> ) + <returnvalue>text</returnvalue> + </para> + <para role="func_signature"> + <function>to_binary</function> ( <type>bigint</type> ) + <returnvalue>text</returnvalue> + </para> + <para> + Converts the number to its equivalent binary representation. + </para> + <para> + <literal>to_binary(2147483647)</literal> + <returnvalue>1111111111111111111111111111111</returnvalue> + </para></entry> + </row> + + <row> + <entry role="func_table_entry"><para role="func_signature"> + <indexterm> + <primary>to_oct</primary> + </indexterm> + <function>to_oct</function> ( <type>integer</type> ) + <returnvalue>text</returnvalue> + </para> + <para role="func_signature"> + <function>to_oct</function> ( <type>bigint</type> ) + <returnvalue>text</returnvalue> + </para> + <para> + Converts the number to its equivalent octal representation. + </para> + <para> + <literal>to_oct(2147483647)</literal> + <returnvalue>17777777777</returnvalue> + </para></entry> + </row> + <row> <entry role="func_table_entry"><para role="func_signature"> <indexterm> diff --git a/src/backend/utils/adt/varlena.c b/src/backend/utils/adt/varlena.c index b1ec5c32ce..b955e54611 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/adt/varlena.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/adt/varlena.c @@ -4919,54 +4919,105 @@ array_to_text_internal(FunctionCallInfo fcinfo, ArrayType *v, return result; } -#define HEXBASE 16 /* - * Convert an int32 to a string containing a base 16 (hex) representation of - * the number. + * We size the buffer for to_binary's longest possible return value, including + * the terminating '\0'. */ -Datum -to_hex32(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) +#define CONVERT_TO_BASE_BUFSIZE (sizeof(uint64) * BITS_PER_BYTE + 1) + +/* + * Workhorse for to_binary, to_oct, and to_hex. Note that base must be > 1 and + * <= 16. buf must be at least CONVERT_TO_BASE_BUFSIZE bytes. + */ +static inline char * +convert_to_base(uint64 value, int base, char *buf) { - uint32 value = (uint32) PG_GETARG_INT32(0); - char *ptr; const char *digits = "0123456789abcdef"; - char buf[32]; /* bigger than needed, but reasonable */ + char *ptr = buf + CONVERT_TO_BASE_BUFSIZE - 1; - ptr = buf + sizeof(buf) - 1; - *ptr = '\0'; + Assert(base > 1); + Assert(base <= 16); + *ptr = '\0'; do { - *--ptr = digits[value % HEXBASE]; - value /= HEXBASE; + *--ptr = digits[value % base]; + value /= base; } while (ptr > buf && value); - PG_RETURN_TEXT_P(cstring_to_text(ptr)); + return ptr; +} + +/* + * Convert an integer to a string containing a base-2 (binary) representation + * of the number. + */ +Datum +to_binary32(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) +{ + uint64 value = (uint64) PG_GETARG_INT32(0); + char buf[CONVERT_TO_BASE_BUFSIZE]; + char *result = convert_to_base(value, 2, buf); + + PG_RETURN_TEXT_P(cstring_to_text(result)); +} +Datum +to_binary64(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) +{ + uint64 value = (uint64) PG_GETARG_INT64(0); + char buf[CONVERT_TO_BASE_BUFSIZE]; + char *result = convert_to_base(value, 2, buf); + + PG_RETURN_TEXT_P(cstring_to_text(result)); } /* - * Convert an int64 to a string containing a base 16 (hex) representation of + * Convert an integer to a string containing a base-8 (oct) representation of * the number. */ Datum -to_hex64(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) +to_oct32(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) +{ + uint64 value = (uint64) PG_GETARG_INT32(0); + char buf[CONVERT_TO_BASE_BUFSIZE]; + char *result = convert_to_base(value, 8, buf); + + PG_RETURN_TEXT_P(cstring_to_text(result)); +} +Datum +to_oct64(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) { uint64 value = (uint64) PG_GETARG_INT64(0); - char *ptr; - const char *digits = "0123456789abcdef"; - char buf[32]; /* bigger than needed, but reasonable */ + char buf[CONVERT_TO_BASE_BUFSIZE]; + char *result = convert_to_base(value, 8, buf); - ptr = buf + sizeof(buf) - 1; - *ptr = '\0'; + PG_RETURN_TEXT_P(cstring_to_text(result)); +} - do - { - *--ptr = digits[value % HEXBASE]; - value /= HEXBASE; - } while (ptr > buf && value); +/* + * Convert an integer to a string containing a base-16 (hex) representation of + * the number. + */ +Datum +to_hex32(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) +{ + uint64 value = (uint64) PG_GETARG_INT32(0); + char buf[CONVERT_TO_BASE_BUFSIZE]; + char *result = convert_to_base(value, 16, buf); - PG_RETURN_TEXT_P(cstring_to_text(ptr)); + PG_RETURN_TEXT_P(cstring_to_text(result)); } +Datum +to_hex64(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) +{ + uint64 value = (uint64) PG_GETARG_INT64(0); + char buf[CONVERT_TO_BASE_BUFSIZE]; + char *result = convert_to_base(value, 16, buf); + + PG_RETURN_TEXT_P(cstring_to_text(result)); +} + +#undef CONVERT_TO_BASE_BUFSIZE /* * Return the size of a datum, possibly compressed diff --git a/src/include/catalog/pg_proc.dat b/src/include/catalog/pg_proc.dat index 6996073989..e046d91c38 100644 --- a/src/include/catalog/pg_proc.dat +++ b/src/include/catalog/pg_proc.dat @@ -3707,6 +3707,18 @@ { oid => '2768', descr => 'split string by pattern', proname => 'regexp_split_to_array', prorettype => '_text', proargtypes => 'text text text', prosrc => 'regexp_split_to_array' }, +{ oid => '9030', descr => 'convert int4 number to binary', + proname => 'to_binary', prorettype => 'text', proargtypes => 'int4', + prosrc => 'to_binary32' }, +{ oid => '9031', descr => 'convert int8 number to binary', + proname => 'to_binary', prorettype => 'text', proargtypes => 'int8', + prosrc => 'to_binary64' }, +{ oid => '9032', descr => 'convert int4 number to oct', + proname => 'to_oct', prorettype => 'text', proargtypes => 'int4', + prosrc => 'to_oct32' }, +{ oid => '9033', descr => 'convert int8 number to oct', + proname => 'to_oct', prorettype => 'text', proargtypes => 'int8', + prosrc => 'to_oct64' }, { oid => '2089', descr => 'convert int4 number to hex', proname => 'to_hex', prorettype => 'text', proargtypes => 'int4', prosrc => 'to_hex32' }, diff --git a/src/test/regress/expected/strings.out b/src/test/regress/expected/strings.out index 62698569e1..28c81ea6e4 100644 --- a/src/test/regress/expected/strings.out +++ b/src/test/regress/expected/strings.out @@ -2129,8 +2129,32 @@ select split_part('@joeuser@mydatabase@','@',-2) AS "mydatabase"; (1 row) -- --- test to_hex +-- test to_binary, to_oct, and to_hex -- +select to_binary(256*256*256 - 1) AS "111111111111111111111111"; + 111111111111111111111111 +-------------------------- + 111111111111111111111111 +(1 row) + +select to_binary(256::bigint*256::bigint*256::bigint*256::bigint - 1) AS "11111111111111111111111111111111"; + 11111111111111111111111111111111 +---------------------------------- + 11111111111111111111111111111111 +(1 row) + +select to_oct(256*256*256 - 1) AS "77777777"; + 77777777 +---------- + 77777777 +(1 row) + +select to_oct(256::bigint*256::bigint*256::bigint*256::bigint - 1) AS "37777777777"; + 37777777777 +------------- + 37777777777 +(1 row) + select to_hex(256*256*256 - 1) AS "ffffff"; ffffff -------- diff --git a/src/test/regress/sql/strings.sql b/src/test/regress/sql/strings.sql index ca32f6bba5..f7e35bfb41 100644 --- a/src/test/regress/sql/strings.sql +++ b/src/test/regress/sql/strings.sql @@ -685,10 +685,15 @@ select split_part('joeuser@mydatabase','@',-3) AS "empty string"; select split_part('@joeuser@mydatabase@','@',-2) AS "mydatabase"; -- --- test to_hex +-- test to_binary, to_oct, and to_hex -- -select to_hex(256*256*256 - 1) AS "ffffff"; +select to_binary(256*256*256 - 1) AS "111111111111111111111111"; +select to_binary(256::bigint*256::bigint*256::bigint*256::bigint - 1) AS "11111111111111111111111111111111"; + +select to_oct(256*256*256 - 1) AS "77777777"; +select to_oct(256::bigint*256::bigint*256::bigint*256::bigint - 1) AS "37777777777"; +select to_hex(256*256*256 - 1) AS "ffffff"; select to_hex(256::bigint*256::bigint*256::bigint*256::bigint - 1) AS "ffffffff"; -- -- 2.25.1

view thread (34+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20230815171715.GA2312399@nathanxps13>
Permalink:  ../20230815171715.GA2312399@nathanxps13/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20230815171715.GA2312399@nathanxps13

 ·  · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: nathandbossart@gmail.com, john.naylor@enterprisedb.com, wolakk@gmail.com, peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com, ericshane@eradman.com
  Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add function to_oct
  In-Reply-To: <20230815171715.GA2312399@nathanxps13>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox