pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
Cc: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Cc: walther@technowledgy.de
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: PRI?64 vs Visual Studio (2022)
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2025 15:19:26 -0500
Message-ID: <2257061.1765829966@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+hUKG+pELXCHkAKAkbF-b5ot=imuoCCoYqhVSX4=pN_VtA3EA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20250331.152829.1921392690375275165.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
	<001bdc3b-ef94-4f24-b017-ac8ff0a2ea55@eisentraut.org>
	<CA+hUKGJnmzTqiODmTjf-23yZ=E3HXqFTtKoyp3TF-MpB93hTMQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<1372793.1763519315@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<CA+hUKGLzXzQcbjEHW08Z6g=mzBkpLtzSJ7Bt2S2XmxP1bwpq8A@mail.gmail.com>
	<1377512.1763522154@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<e7b902aa-98ac-4d35-bae3-d7d282a938c2@eisentraut.org>
	<1462038.1763567038@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<CA+hUKG+nMv9bmOcARaDFC6rG=SGWC=TwWSRLrxi29oGeRNKemg@mail.gmail.com>
	<1881391.1765782112@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<ef44619f-a25b-41e5-be87-d3971ff8c1d3@eisentraut.org>
	<CA+hUKG+pELXCHkAKAkbF-b5ot=imuoCCoYqhVSX4=pN_VtA3EA@mail.gmail.com>

Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2025 at 8:29 AM Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> wrote:
>> I think that means that that gettext implementation is not currently
>> supportable.  So either we revert our PRI* use except those two
>> (unlikely), or those buildfarm members should disable NLS.

> Yeah.  My goal in mentioning the problem back when it was just a
> problem in theory (we had no test, the Alpine packages disable nls
> (perhaps it used to be *more* broken, if they did that before we used
> PRI?)) was to try to see if someone closer to these musl distros
> wanted to have a crack at fixing it, since it looks pretty close to
> being usable.  But now that it's a problem in practice, it's hard to
> disagree with Peter's take.  It could be reenabled any time it works
> enough to pass the test.

Fair enough.  I've revised the test mechanism per discussion with
Bryan Green, in hopes of being able to test on more BF animals than
we could yesterday.  But I won't put in an expected-file for this
Alpine misbehavior.

			regards, tom lane





view thread (41+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <2257061.1765829966@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../2257061.1765829966@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/2257061.1765829966@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply
Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, thomas.munro@gmail.com, peter@eisentraut.org, horikyota.ntt@gmail.com, walther@technowledgy.de, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: PRI?64 vs Visual Studio (2022)
  In-Reply-To: <2257061.1765829966@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox