From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: CREATE OR REPLACE AGGREGATE?
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2019 10:22:50 -0400
Message-ID: <22790.1552832570@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190317091410.GD3357@paquier.xyz>
References: <8736nm55gv.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk>
<20190317091410.GD3357@paquier.xyz>
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes:
> On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 07:35:16AM +0000, Andrew Gierth wrote:
>> I took a bash at actually writing it and didn't see any obvious problems
>> (I'll post the patch in a bit). Is there some reason (other than
>> shortage of round tuits) why this might not be a good idea, or why it
>> hasn't been done before?
> Indeed.
Yeah, it seems like mostly a lack-of-round-tuits problem.
Updating the aggregate's dependencies correctly might be a bit tricky, but
it can't be any worse than the corresponding problem for functions...
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, michael@paquier.xyz, andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: CREATE OR REPLACE AGGREGATE?
In-Reply-To: <22790.1552832570@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox