pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Instability of partition_prune regression test results
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2019 13:34:19 -0400
Message-ID: <24792.1569692059@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+HiwqEO+bouYq2kFGRCQHarAk-MYoheaU6T1twC1-GENZJPrQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <11952.1569536725@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<CA+HiwqH-3GZKh42gBe0b=ecwOzjZY19ZzwL35OBepqLvoFG19w@mail.gmail.com>
	<11381.1569599943@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<CA+HiwqEO+bouYq2kFGRCQHarAk-MYoheaU6T1twC1-GENZJPrQ@mail.gmail.com>

Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 12:59 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> writes:
>>> Isn't the point of using ANALYZE here to show that the exec-param
>>> based run-time pruning is working (those "never executed" strings)?

>> Hm.  Well, if you want to see those, we could do it as attached.

> Perfect, thanks.

OK, pushed that way.

			regards, tom lane





view thread (5+ messages)

Message-ID: <24792.1569692059@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../24792.1569692059@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/24792.1569692059@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply
Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, amitlangote09@gmail.com, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: Instability of partition_prune regression test results
  In-Reply-To: <24792.1569692059@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox